Friday, August 28, 2009

A good metaphor jumps out at you from the dark alleyway of life

I really dislike being quizzed on my knowledge of Canadian literature. It usually happens at parties when I call myself a writer and the other person asks whether I've read a certain book by a certain author and I have to admit I haven't, despite that author being a well-known Canadian, and then they frown like I'm being uncooperative on purpose.

So I'm trying to brush up on Canadian lit to save myself the embarrassment.

I'm nearly finished a non-fiction book by Jan Zwicky, a Canadian poet and philosopher, called Wisdom & Metaphor. One cool feature is its page numbering. On each left-hand page there's Jan Zwicky's writing, and it shares a page number with an excerpt on the right-hand page by some other writer. So structurally the book itself is metaphor-like because each page matches up writings from two different authors that are meant to bring each other new meaning.

Jan Zwicky is really, really smart. Some pages I only slightly understand, just enough to realize I could get it if someone explained it to me. Jan Zwicky is in cahoots with Don McKay, Robert Bringhurst and a few other Canadian writers and academics who have similar ideas about language and the way it means what it means.

"Gestalt shift" comes up a lot on the left-hand pages. It's meant to describe a metaphor's immediate effect on a person. At UBC my English profs loved to ask us students to define metaphor, and that seems to be something even Jan Zwicky struggles with. So don't feel bad if you don't know what it means either. Because by definition a metaphor should contain two non-identical parts, but once a metaphor stops surprising us, we understand it automatically as one concept without having to put in the effort of making a comparison. I think computer memory might be a good example of a term that was once metaphorical. Because although a person's brain stores information differently from a computer, some clever person coined the metaphor "computer memory" and it stuck because it gestalt shifted people into better understanding their hard drive. But now we just accept that computers have memory--it's not a metaphor because we're no longer surprised and delighted to hear it said. Anyway, that's paraphrasing what I learned from Jan Zwicky so I hope I got it right. I think she would approve.

I also tried to read a book of Jan Zwicky's poems, Thirty-seven Small Songs & Thirteen Silences, but I didn't understand any of them! The language was simple and the poems were short but they still made me feel stupid. So for my self-esteem's sake I'm glad I'm having better luck with her non-fiction.

4 comments:

  1. If you are interested in brushing up on Canadian writers, I would like to recommend Monique Proulx. She is quebecoise but you should find most of her works translated into english. My favourite is Aurora Montrealis (the english translation of Les Aurores Montreales), an anthology of short stories that take place in Montreal. Not only will you discover a new author but you will learn more about Montreal culture!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Zwicky is an odd one. Do you think she is a post-modernist or a modernist?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not very familiar with the literary movements. Some of the words she uses sound kind of po-mo to me. What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  4. She teaches in an analytic philosophy department, so I would guess she is not po-mo, but she's also a poet and a violinist, so...

    I haven't read enough of her work to make the judgment. I'll take your word that she's sort of po-mo, which is what I guess you're implying.

    ReplyDelete